Uncorroborated citizen informant tip not enough

Police received a citizen informant’s report that a car with a specific Montana plate had left a motel, and the hallway and two rooms smelled like marijuana. The police found the car and pulled it over. The only corroboration was of the license number. Nothing out of the ordinary was going on, and the driver and occupants were acting normally. The stop and ordering them out of the car and then searching it was unreasonable. State v. Sweedland, 2006 SD 77, 721 N.W.2d 409 (August 16, 2006).

Defendant was clocked at 88 in a 65, and that was reason for his stop. While checking the license, the officer found out defendant had an outstanding warrant. Defendant’s admission that he had a gun was pre- and post-Miranda, therefore not suppressed, and the gun would have inevitably been found in an inventory search of the car. United States v. Smith, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58172 (N.D. Ohio August 18, 2006).*

Parole officer’s home visit led to finding of a gun, and it is clear under Knights and Samson that parolees have a far lesser expectation of privacy than the general public. United States v. Stuckey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58173 (S.D. N.Y. August 8, 2006).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.