OR: Two on scope of consent, one suppressing drug paraphernalia found during a courthouse security check

Defendant put her purse through the x-ray at the security checkpoint into a juvenile court facility. There were signs warning about searches for weapons. The security officer opened her purse and found a spoon as drug paraphernalia. The consent was limited to the search for weapons and not for drug paraphernalia. State v. Winn, 278 Ore. App. 460, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 639 (May 25, 2016).

Defendant was the victim of an assault in a park, and he was separated from his backpack. When he got it back, the officer responding asked for consent to search it. To a reasonable person, this included consent to search a knotted plastic grocery bag found inside. Based on what defendant had just been through, there was no reason he’d think he was consenting to a search for drugs, too. State v. Blair, 278 Ore. App. 512, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 617 (May 25, 2016).

This entry was posted in Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.