Federal district court cases received today

Officer in plainclothes and off-duty assisting a crime victim who was subjected to police brutality by another officer before plaintiff’s identity was known was governed by the D.C. Police worker’s comp law as an exclusive remedy, and he could not sue the officer for police brutality. Johnson v. District of Columbia, 445 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. D.C. August 10, 2006).*

Neighbor’s report to police of burglary in progress where officers found back door kicked in could enter under the community caretaking function. United States v. Sanger, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55479 (N.D. Iowa August 9, 2006).

Staleness argument in records search failed because of the ongoing nature of the conspiracy and crime. United States v. Sechler, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55269 (M.D. Pa. August 9, 2006).*

The CI’s information, viewed under Gates, was sufficient to show PC for the warrant. United States v. Grazioso, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55384 (N.D. Tex. August 9, 2006).*

Patdown led to plain feel of crack cocaine. United States v. Woody, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55274 (W.D. Va. August 9, 2006).*

The officers’ experience in dealing with drug traffickers could be credited toward whether the conduct of the defendant was RS for a stop. United States v. Nguyen, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55315 (D. Vt. August 7, 2006).

RS to detain the driver of a car necessarily includes the power to detain the passengers as a part of the stop of the driver. United States v. Sanders, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55328 (W.D. Mo. July 12, 2006).

Nebraska “familiar” ruse checkpoint produced stop sign violation at bottom of off ramp, and that was cause of stop. United States v. Loya, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55391 (D. Neb. June 16, 2006).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.