CA8: A consent to search for firearms includes checking clothing hanging in a closet

A consent to search for firearms includes checking clothing hanging in a closet. The consent was obtained for a parole search. United States v. Anderson, 674 F.3d 821 (8th Cir. 2012)*:

Even assuming a reasonable officer would have interpreted the consent as limited in scope to a search for firearms, the search was within the scope of such consent. United States v. Dinwiddie, 618 F.3d 821, 831 (8th Cir. 2010) (“The scope of consent for a search is limited to what a reasonable person would have understood by the exchange between the investigating officer and the person to be searched.”). Firearms easily could be located in clothing hanging in a closet, particularly in outerwear such as a coat, jacket, or vest, and most particularly in a blaze orange hunting vest. See United States v. Lopez-Mendoza, 601 F.3d 861, 867 (8th Cir. 2010) (“The scope of a search is generally defined by its expressed object …”). Further, the testimony supports the conclusion that the searching officer identified the ammunition without delving into spaces, pockets, or containers smaller than might hold a firearm.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.