CA2: Parolee’s arrest did not elevate his status to non-parolee for Fourth Amendment purposes

The district court granted suppression in a parole search case where the parole officer received a complaint that defendant had fired a gun at a complainant. Under New York law, defendant consented to a parole search by accepting parole. His arrest did not elevate him to the status of a non-parolee subject to greater Fourth Amendment protection. The parole officer was still entitled to search the defendant’s property. Suppression reversed. United States v. Barner, 666 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2012).*

Where statements were made two months after the allegedly illegal search, the statements were clearly attenuated from the allegedly illegal search. United States v. Bergin, 455 Fed. Appx. 908 (11th Cir. 2012).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.