D.Haw.: Ex parte communications about SW issuance doesn’t require later recusal

The fact there were ex parte communications with a judge about a wiretap warrant doesn’t require recusal of the judge. United States v. Kobayashi, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220121 (D. Haw. Sep. 28, 2026).

Plaintiff can’t show causation for his alleged injury from excessive force, so summary judgment for the officer. Brown v. Inglehart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219722 (E.D. Ark. Sep. 28, 2026).*

Plaintiff’s § 1983 suit over his arrest is barred by Younger abstention because he can raise all those issues in state court first. Anderson v. Price, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219763 (W.D.Ark. Sep. 28, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abstention, Excessive force, Neutral and detached magistrate. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.