CA5: Bogus traffic stop can’t support frisk

Plaintiff plausibly alleged a bogus traffic stop and so the frisk lacked reasonable suspicion and violated the Fourth Amendment. This is clearly established law. Rosales v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29016 (5th Cir. Sep. 22, 2026). (Reason article here.)

Any possible error in finding defendant’s firearm under the public safety exception to Miranda wa harmless. State v. Crawford, 2026 MT 225 (Sep. 22, 2026).*

“We agree with the issuing judge that both prongs of the Aguilar-Spinelli test were satisfied by the affidavit in this case. We therefore affirm the issuing judge’s finding of probable cause and the issuance of the warrant to search Defendant’s home, and reverse the district court’s contrary conclusion.” There was a Franks challenge, too, and, while there were no good findings on that from the trial court, the court of appeals independently doesn’t find them material to probable cause. State v. Sneed, 2026 N.M. App. LEXIS 69 (Sep. 28, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.