TN: Bailbond bounty hunter not state actor

Bailbonding agent’s bounty hunters were not state actors in capturing defendant and searching his car. State v. Dragg, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 637 (Sep. 24, 2026).

Defendant’s post-conviction petition argues defense counsel applied the wrong standard of review but it doesn’t matter because he would lose anyway. Kim v. Brown, 2026 Ore. App. LEXIS 1472 (Sep. 10, 2026).*

The additional ¾ hour to 2 hours to get a search warrant for defendant’s blood here was exigency. State v. Adams, 2026 Ore. App. LEXIS 1427 (Sep. 23, 2026).*

Defendant was in custody at the time he was told to raise his seat cushion. It wasn’t voluntary consent–it was acquiescence to authority. United States v. Barron, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29273 (9th Cir. Sep. 24, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.