ND: Probation search of cell phone was reasonable

Probation search of defendant’s cell phone, whether he owned it or merely possessed it, was reasonable. He claimed it was someone else’s. State v. Warner, 2026 ND 133 (July 9, 2026).

Habeas petitioner’s Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim was never presented to the state courts, so it’s defaulted. Purpura v. Smith, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152991 (S.D. Ohio July 10, 2026).*

A FinCEN geographic targeting order (GTO) for money transfer companies within a small distance from the Mexican border report all transactions over $200 violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims are left undecided as unnecessary. Novedades v. Fin. Crimes Enf’t Network, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 20429 (9th Cir. July 13, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.