DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

The officer’s unreasonable mistake of law on windshield tint (“can’t have tint at all” v. it can have some) did not make the stop reasonable under Heien. Griffin v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 19, 2026).

Defendant’s nolo plea to a drug charge where the search also led to federal child pornography charges wasn’t issue preclusion in federal court, followed CA2 and CA10. United States v. Vorse, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57442 (D. Neb. Mar. 19, 2026).*

Officers knew and could see defendant fled into a house, and they could follow to arrest him. Versey v. Ebert, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57555 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 19, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.