TX8: Motorcycle parked on driveway closer to road than house wasn’t on curtilage

Officers didn’t enter the curtilage to look at defendant’s motorcycle. It was parked on dirt strip driveway closer to the street than the house, all confirmed by bodycam. Groh v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3572 (Tex. App. – El Paso May 23, 2025).

“Donovan does not identify on appeal which statements in the affidavits were ‘deliberately false or made with reckless disregard for the truth.’ Instead, he cites to the memorandum in support of the motion to suppress submitted to the district court and argues that the Government did not dispute the alleged misrepresentations but rather ‘attempted to justify the affiant’s action.’ Therefore, we have analyzed the filings submitted to the district court.” And he loses for lack of a showing. United States v. Bourrage, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 12360 (5th Cir. May 21, 2025).*

Defendant was lost in a construction area because his vehicle GPS wasn’t accurate, and he stopped at a police car for directions. One thing led to another, and he was arrested for DUI. A search of the car revealed a firearm he was prohibited from possessing. The search was valid. United States v. Reed, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96712 (S.D. Ind. May 21, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.