W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed

Defendant’s traffic stop was reasonable because of a cracked windshield on his truck, and a question about consent to search near the end of the ticket writing process didn’t unlawfully extend it. United States v. Calderon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58610 (W.D. La. Feb. 24, 2025),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56756 W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2025)*:

Even assuming Deputy Johnson had extended the duration of the traffic stop, however, he did so only after he developed reasonable suspicion to believe that Calderon may have been engaged in other criminal activity. Like the encounter itself, his suspicions developed dynamically:

  • Calderon made odd, evasive, or inconsistent statements regarding basic information like the load he was hauling and the route he was traveling;
  • Calderon’s logbook was not updated (for that day);
  • Calderon had a prior (albeit 23-year-old) drug trafficking conviction, which he had earlier denied;
  • after Calderon consented to the search, Deputy Johnson found a handwritten prayer to Santa Muerte, whom Mexican cartel members and drug traffickers claim is a “patron saint”; and
  • the canine alerted to Calderon’s trailer.
This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.