E.D.Cal.: No standing in business search outside of personal office

Defendant’s failure to show that anything was seized from his personal office separates this business search from Mancusi v. DeForte and SDI Future Health, so his motion to reconsider is denied. United States v. Salyer, 814 F. Supp. 2d 984 (E.D. Cal. 2011).*

After defendant asked for three appointed attorneys to be excused from his case because of inability to get along with the lawyers, he was warned that he wasn’t getting a fourth lawyer, and he’d have to go pro se or retain counsel if it happened again. Just before the suppression hearing, the third lawyer made a motion to be relieved because he had irreconcilable differences with defendant. The court granted the motion but ordered the lawyer to remain as standby counsel for the suppression motion. Defendant was not unconstitutionally denied his right to counsel at the suppression hearing. Long v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98348 (E.D. Tenn. August 31, 2011).

The Pennsylvania State Trooper was described here as a narcotics intelligence officer who stopped a speeding rented SUV because he felt there was something up. While the factors the officer relied on for his suspicions were normal activity, other factors learned during the valid stop supported reasonable suspicion: Five car rentals in the previous four months, four border crossings from Mexico that year (per EPIC), he wasn’t an authorized driver on the car. United States v. Anderson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98233 (E.D. Pa. August 30, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.