AR: Probation search waiver can be required in suspended sentences, too

The state probation search waiver statute doesn’t refer to suspended sentences, but the court has the power to impose it there, too, even without a supervision requirement. Johnson v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 509 (Nov. 8, 2023).

The dog sniff of the car done contemporaneously with the defendant’s records check did not prolong the stop. The video shows the stopping officer working the computer while it was happening. United States v. Burney, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200076 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2023).*

The affidavit for warrant wasn’t materially false. It stated that one purpose of the search was to identify a man named “Quiet.” The fact a witness couldn’t ID Quiet adds nothing nor does it detract. United States v. Bermudez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200006 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2023).*

The search warrant was for “Apartment 1” and it included a picture. That apartment was searched. The warrant was particular. United States v. Quinones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200208 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197910 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2023).* (Really?)

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.