MI: Trees on undeveloped land were not “effects” for 4A

A city ordinance regulating trees was not a Fourth Amendment seizure because the trees were not on the curtilage of a home and weren’t independently subject to the Fourth Amendment. (Otherwise, a taking occurred, and that’s way outside the scope of this blog.) Charter Twp. of Canton v. 44650, Inc., 2023 Mich. App. LEXIS 2634 (Apr. 13, 2023).

“Norweathers raises a variety of other issues challenging the court’s denial of his motion to suppress and claiming that the missing computer contained exculpatory evidence that had to be produced. Among other issues, he contends that the application for the search warrant was insufficient to establish probable cause, that the search went beyond what the warrant authorized, that the search was unconstitutional because the application did not name him as the target,” and a bunch of other stuff. “None of the arguments is cogent enough to suggest constitutional error. The court declines to consider them further.” United States v. Norweathers, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64931 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 13, 2023).*

The affidavit for warrant corroborated the CI and established nexus for the property. Commonwealth v. Shackelford, 2023 PA Super 66, 2023 Pa. Super. LEXIS 149 (Apr. 14, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Open fields. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.