E.D.Ark.: “Place of residence” for a parole search of an absconder includes a motel room he’s staying in

The “place of residence” for a parole search of an absconder includes a motel room he’s staying in. He also has no standing to challenge a search of a trash can outside the room. United States v. Nichols, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209269 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2022). [As I’ve explained to clients, “you can’t move around just to avoid a parole search.”]

Codefendant doesn’t have standing to challenge entry and search of a hotel room she apparently was just visiting in. “Rather, she appears to concede that Stacy Clinton rented the room. And she doesn’t contest that the search occurred in the middle of the day. There is no indication that she was an overnight guest. On these facts, Anthony cannot claim a reasonable expectation of privacy in the room.” United States v. Anthony, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209267 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2022).*

The protective sweep of defendant’s car was based on reasonable suspicion he could be armed. United States v. Ross, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207657 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2022).*

“The Court here does not need to determine whether the provisions of the warrant lacked sufficient particularization because even if the warrant was overbroad, the good faith exception applies.” United States v. Moss, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209261 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 15, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.