CA4: Def’s Facebook post and demeanor justified stop-and-frisk

Defendant’s Facebook post and his past supported reasonable suspicion for his stop and frisk of his fanny pack at a fair. He was a known member of a violent gang with a felony conviction, his house had been recently shot at, and his recent Facebook post strongly implied something would happen there. United States v. Gist-Davis, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 19733 (4th Cir. July 18, 2022).

Doing a warrants check of officer safety on occupants of an apartment during a knock-and-talk about a disturbance complaint was not unreasonable. State v. Kolle, 2022-Ohio-2459, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 2329 (12th Dist. July 18, 2022).

Failure to include a forfeiture specification in the charging document precluded an order for destruction of firearms. State v. Humphrey, 2022-Ohio-2456, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 2339 (12th Dist. July 18, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Forfeiture, Knock and talk, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.