N.D.Ga.: No right to pre-execution litigation of an OSHA administrative SW

There is no right to a pre-enforcement motion to quash an OSHA administrative warrant, despite the fact the whole process occurs quickly. The company has a post-execution process to remedy alleged violations. United States v. Foundation Foods Group, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205470 (N.D.Ga. Oct. 18, 2021).

“Abdulaziz Ghedi is an international businessman who regularly jets across the globe. Frequent travelers, however, are not always trusted travelers. In recent years, Ghedi has had repeated run-ins with one of America’s most beloved institutions: modern airport security. Ghedi complains that ever since he refused to be an informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation a decade ago, he has been placed on a watchlist, leading to ‘extreme burdens and hardship while traveling.’ Unsurprisingly, the Government refuses to confirm or deny anything. Ghedi says these intrusive security annoyances have harmed him both professionally and reputationally. The law, however, is not on his side. Modern air travel is chock-full of irritations and indignities that leave many passengers not just bothered but humiliated. But Ghedi has not pleaded plausible claims, nor sued the right people. While Ghedi’s hassles are certainly atypical, they do not dispense with our jurisdictional limits or with ordinary pleading standards. We thus AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Ghedi’s complaint.” Ghedi v. Mayorkas, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32009 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Motion to suppress. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.