D.N.H.: Jardines implied license to approach front door doesn’t extend to back patio

An implied license to come to the front door, if it exists under Jardines, doesn’t permit officers coming to the back patio area on the curtilage. Here, however, the emergency aid exception applied, and there was no Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Leonard, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199921 (D.N.H. Oct. 18, 2021).

There was reasonable suspicion for plaintiff’s stop. “After review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not reversibly err in granting summary judgment to Pelfrey and Labrecque on this portion of Capps’ claim. Prior to stopping Capps, these Defendants had received reliable and credible information that he was taking pictures of children and had reported that he was a pedophile. Capps also was observed possessing a camera and refused to explain what he was photographing. Altogether, the information these Defendants had gave rise to a reasonable suspicion that Capps was in possession of child pornography or was grooming children in preparation for child trafficking or abduction.” Capps v. Long, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 31180 (4th Cir. Oct. 18, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.