E.D.Mich.: Officers could accompany POs where there was fear def engaged in criminal conduct

It was not unreasonable for law enforcement officers to accompany defendant’s parole officer on a parole search because of concerns defendant was involved in criminal conduct. United States v. Davis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147629 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 6, 2021).

“Brewster’s motion for a Franks hearing is denied because the statements and omissions he identifies in the agent affidavits were not sufficient to deprive the magistrate judge of a substantial basis for issuing the search warrants.” The court gives no weight to the argument that certain adjectives should be discounted. Defendant also lacks standing to contest recording of his calls by the CI. United States v. Brewster, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147069 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, 2021).*

As a part of the Stone v. Powell inquiry, a habeas petitioner has to show that the state processes afforded him to challenge a search and seizure somehow broke down and that denied him relief. “Petitioner has not alleged facts showing that the state’s mechanism has broken down. Rather, the record shows that the Michigan courts gave Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim full and proper consideration.” Nolan v. Braman, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147696 (W.D.Mich. July 7, 2021),* adopted 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146615 (W.D.Mich. Aug. 5, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.