PA: Arrest warrant for another at address justified entry under Steagald

Officers had an arrest warrant for a man at the defendant’s location, and he let them in, even though he claimed not to live there. The warrant was valid under Steagald, and this case was similar to Conception. Defendant’s constructive possession was shown. Commonwealth v. Muniz, 2010 PA Super 160, 5 A.3d 345 (2010).*

Maryland applies Gant good faith to a search that was valid at the time it happened but not now. The stop was based on a DMV return showing that the vehicle was not properly registered, and it was not up to the state to prove that the underlying record was correct [all in the context of whether the exclusionary rule should apply]. McCain v. State, 194 Md. App. 252, 4 A.3d 53 (2010).*

Where dispatch reports that the vehicle was not properly registered in the state of its LP, a stop is justified. Defendants then consented. United States v. Collier, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92418 (W.D. Ark. August 9, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.