CA3: Foreign search didn’t violate 4A

“Standing alone, foreign law enforcement officials sharing information gleaned from their own activities with United States authorities — even if cloaked in cooperative terms in agency reports — is not indicative of an impermissible joint venture, and thus, the District Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the wiretap evidence. For the same reasons, we discern no error in the District Court’s denial of Minaya’s motion to reconsider the suppression of the wiretap evidence.” United States v. Minaya, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28852 (3d Cir. Sept. 11, 2020).

This entry was posted in Foreign searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.