E.D.Tenn.: DUI supports a SI under Gant

DUI is an offense for which evidence of an offense might be found, so a search incident is valid, rejecting Brown v. State, 24 So. 3d 671, 679 (Fla. Dist. 5DCA 2009). United States v. Reagan, 713 F. Supp. 2d 724 (E.D. Tenn. 2010).*

Police were called to a motel room because the manager suspected that defendant and his 12 year old daughter were having sex there. The officer knocked at the door, and asked to talk to the defendant, who showed at the door in only a towel. The officer asked if they could talk inside, and defendant said no and stepped into the hall and shut the door behind him. The interaction between the defendant and the officer was consensual. In any event, the conversation was based on reasonable suspicion. The entry into the room was also by consent, and incriminating evidence was in plain view. United States v. Pelling, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50195 (D. Ore. May 20, 2010).*

Defense counsel did not file a motion to suppress the search of defendant’s bedroom because he believed it was valid as a search incident. The location of a gun found there was never referred to at trial. Cash was found in a nightstand drawer and that came into evidence. Even if there was a Fourth Amendment violation, the cash was harmless error in light of the other evidence at trial. Womack v. United States, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50016 (S.D. Ill. May 20, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.