FL4: Arrest outside here did not justify protective sweep of house

Officers arrested a suspect outside a house. They had a reasonable belief that others were inside, but no reason to believe that they posed any kind of threat. A protective sweep of those inside could have been valid if there were articulable reasons for it, but here there were none. Diaz v. State, 34 So. 3d 797 (Fla. App. 4DCA 2010) (good discussion of protective sweep doctrine).

Defendant prison official had qualified immunity for threatening force to obtain a DNA sample which plaintiff concedes he could obtain from him. Rendelman v. Scott, 378 Fed. Appx. 309 (4th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

Defendant denied living at the place searched; he only stored a couch there. He lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy there. All he had there was a couch he was storing. United States v. Perry, 379 Fed. Appx. 888 (11th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.