D.S.D.: Cross corroboration of three CIs’ stories was PC

The cross corroboration of three CIs’ stories was probable cause. United States v. Wilford, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6074 (D.S.D. Jan. 14, 2020).

“The officers had probable cause to arrest Mancilla-Ibarra because Fann’s information was veritable, reliable, and corroborated.” The fact a CI is a criminal doesn’t make the information per se unreliable. United States v. Mancilla-Ibarra, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1279 (11th Cir. Jan. 15, 2020).*

The proof of consent wasn’t overwhelming, but it was there on balance. The officers told defendant that, without consent, everyone would be detained until a search warrant was obtained. Then came the consent. United States v. Garner, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224775 (W.D. N.C. Dec. 5, 2019),* adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4532 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.