OH10: 911 call from ID’d person two men waving guns in a library is RS

911 call from an identified person that two men were waving guns in a library was reasonable suspicion. State v. Davidson, 2019-Ohio-5320, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5399 (10th Dist. Dec. 24, 2019).*

Defendant fails in his ineffectiveness claim. “Even assuming appellant was given deficient advice, Buckley fails to demonstrate that a motion to suppress would have led to exclusion. It is his duty to support his argument with case law, but he does not direct us to any that supports his argument that suppression is warranted here.” Also, deficient advice isn’t state action. State v. Buckley, 2019-Ohio-5309, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5372 (11th Dist. Dec. 23, 2019).* [This case actually deals with defense counsel telling him it would be wise to talk to the police, and then he incriminated himself. He alleges nothing to show that the statement would be suppressed. Not a search case, but the rule is the same.]

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.