CA9: There is no heightened duty of a court to better explain the supervised release search condition

There is no heightened liberty interest in defendant’s being subjected to supervised release searches that require a heightened explanation from the court when it’s imposed. United States v. San Nicolas, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 37093 (9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2019).

In the negligence claim in a California excessive force claim, the district court erred in excluding evidence of potential knowledge of plaintiff’s mental illness that, if dealt with at the scene, could have avoided his death. Crawford v. City of Bakersfield, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 37056 (9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2019).*

Federal officers did not unreasonably rely on the scope of a state warrant and did not exceed its scope. The district court’s findings that the search warrant affidavit did not contain material falsehoods and that the alleged falsehoods weren’t material to probable cause is supported by the record. United States v. Huntoon, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 37119 (9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.