CA9: Riley no basis for successor habeas

A successor habeas isn’t a way to raise a Riley cell phone search claim. Young v. Pfeiffer, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23923 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019).

There was reasonable suspicion to continue the detention from unusual nervousness, inconsistent stories about where they were coming from and where they were going, and an inability to produce any documents for the rental car they were in. United States v. Laneaux, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141657 (S.D. Miss. Aug. 21, 2019).*

The dash cam video shows defendant’s traffic offenses and then refusal to stop right away when the emergency lights came on. The stop was lawful. United States v. Ledford, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143031 (N.D. Ind. July 19, 2019),* adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142471 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 22, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.