CA4: Def’s unlocking cell phone without sharing passcode was not communicative act

The officer who had defendant’s cell phone asked her to unlock it. She entered the passcode without sharing it or him seeing her do it. It wasn’t a communicative act. It’s like providing a key. Her motion to suppress the cell phone for lack of a Miranda warning before unlocking the phone was denied under Patane. United States v. Oloyede, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22741 (4th Cir. July 31, 2019).

Defendant failed to show that the government overseized evidence without regard to the search warrant thereby making it a general warrant. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125335 (D.Haw. July 26, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Overseizure, Privileges. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.