W.D.Ky.: Drug dog immediately on the scene didn’t extend the stop

Because the drug dog got right there, the dog sniff didn’t extend the stop in violation of Rodriguez. United States v. Thorn, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70781 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 26, 2019).

Defendant argues that his case was like Rodriguez, but it’s not because there are numerous factors for reasonable suspicion to extend the stop. United States v. Rootes, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70094 (D. Minn. Apr. 26, 2019).*

Being under the influence of drugs while in possession of multiple firearms was a violation of state law, and that justified a seizure of his weapons. United States v. Westphal, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71227 (D. S.D. Mar. 12, 2019),* adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71226 (D.S.D. Apr. 24, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.