C.D.Cal. LAPD didn’t violate 4A by not returning a seized gun without a court order as required by CA law

Plaintiff sued LAPD for not returning firearms seized without a state court order as required by California law. Plaintiff hasn’t shown that the LAPD policy violates the Fourth Amendment. Wright v. Beck, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15778 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2019).

Defendant is found to have consented to seizure of a gun that was laying in the open in his house with kids running around. He agreed with the officer it “was a good idea” to do that. United States v. Nelson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16323 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 1, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.