FL5: Record doesn’t show no standing in CSLI; remanded

The record does not conclusively show that defendant was without standing to challenge the CSLI from the cell phone at issue. Remanded. Litz v. State, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 649 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan. 18, 2019).*

A store loss prevention employee’s report to the police supported more than reasonable suspicion that defendant was attempting to commit credit card fraud in his store: He didn’t know the basic information on the credit card account. Mathis v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 18 (Jan. 17, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.