OH2: CSLI raised first in appeal reply brief isn’t timely; harmless on this record anyway

Defendant never raised CSLI until his reply brief on appeal after Carpenter came down, and a reply brief is too late. Even if he could have preserved the issue, the evidence was overwhelming and harmless. State v. Kennedy, 2018-Ohio-4997, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 5326 (2d Dist. Dec. 14, 2018).*

In an immigration removal, “Because even a successful motion to suppress would have yielded little practical benefit to Beltran-Trejo’s overall immigration proceeding, it was not unreasonable for his prior attorney to forgo a motion to suppress in favor of seeking prosecutorial discretion.” Beltran-Trejo v. Whitaker, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 35082 (9th Cir. Dec. 13, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.