CA9: SW for stolen property in def’s house wasn’t stale despite it being a month

Defendant’s thumb print on a beer can found in a burglarized house was a reasonable inference he was involved. The search warrant for his house for stolen property wasn’t stale because it was reasonable to believe he would still be in possession of stolen property a month later. United States v. Kirkland, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33360 (9th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018).

Officers had reasonable suspicion based on witness statements and locating defendant’s car near the scene of the crime. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201107 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.