W.D.Pa.: Request for CI’s identity was speculative venture here and denied

Defendant’s claim he needs the CI’s name to attempt to come up with an alibi defense is essentially speculative and fishing for information without a real goal. It doesn’t overcome Roviaro. United States v. Noble, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161139 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 21, 2018).

Plaintiff’s § 1983 false arrest case against police officers is time barred. Everybody else is absolutely immune or not subject to suit either. Kennedy v. City of Philadelphia, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 27081 (3d Cir. Sep. 21, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.