VT: Entry into respondent’s land to investigate open fire was reasonable

Respondent was burning something on his open land without a burn permit. Firefighters were called, and they observed from the road that the color of the smoke indicated something other than natural wood was being burned. From their view, however, they could not see the base of the fire to see what was burning, and it could have been a building. It was becoming wind blown. The firefighter’s entry onto the property to view the fire, although with mixed motives, was reasonable. Anr v. Shattuck, 2016 Vt. Super. LEXIS 87 (Env. Div. Sept. 27, 2016).

The trial court credited the officer that defendant was arrested at the scheme of a vehicular homicide, transported him to a hospital, and obtained written consent to draw his blood. That’s binding on appeal. People v. Elder, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 384 (6th Dist. April 26, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Standards of review. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.