OH8: Taking pictures of sex with a minor with a cell phone supports SW for home computer for storage

The child victim’s claim that defendant used his cell phone to take pictures of the two of them having sex logically supported a search warrant for defendant’s computers in his house because of the ease with which images can be moved between them for storage. State v. Waters, 2017-Ohio-650, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 648 (8th Dist. Feb. 23, 2017).

Crossing the centerline of a two lane highway is an offense that justifies a stop. Pridemore v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 84 (Feb. 24, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Computer searches, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.