MO: Where there are two justifications for a stop, challenging only one does not provide relief

There were two justifications for defendant’s stop. Defendant only challenged one, so it’s moot.
State v. Swartz, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 74 (Feb. 14, 2017).

The sound of defendant’s car apparently hitting another car constituted a hit and run, and that was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. Holmes, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17635 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.