MT: RS not needed to stop a commercial truck because they are closely regulated

“We conclude that the officer did not need a fact-based particularized suspicion to stop and inspect the truck because it was a commercial vehicle subject to close regulation by law.” The driver was found under the influence. State v. Beaver, 2016 MT 332, 2016 Mont. LEXIS 1080 (Dec. 20, 2016).

In Texas, one can ask for a jury instruction on an illegal search for the jury to decide it [good luck with that]. Where the officers and a nurse testified defendant consented to a blood draw and defendant didn’t remember, “The trial did not err in failing to instruct the jury under article 38.23 because the evidence did not raise a fact issue regarding appellant’s consent to the blood draw.” Hovis v. State, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 13590 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Dec. 22, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.