N.D.Ohio: SW affiant doesn’t need to include CI’s criminal history, too, if it otherwise passes muster

The search warrant affiant wasn’t required to include the CI’s criminal history as a possible indicator of lack of credibility. The key is past information that has proven truthful or detailed or corroborated current observations that bespeak credibility. United States v. Courtney, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162883 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 23, 2016), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6857 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 18, 2017).

Defendant’s 2255 discovery requests are denied without showing far more. Moreover, they attempt to argue Fourth Amendment claims that are barred anyway. Tragas v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163359 (E.D.Mich. Nov. 28, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.