S.D.Cal.: Cell phone could be searched at border on finding of cocaine in car

Finding 16.52 kg of cocaine in a car at the border was probable cause, and seizure of the defendant’s cell phone was proper. Therefore, it did not matter whether or not the cell phone was “forensically” searched or “cursorily” searched because of the probable cause. United States v. Cano, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163675 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 23, 2016).

Defendant tried and convicted of a child pornography offense couldn’t raise a Fourth Amendment claim for the first time in a 2255. It was procedurally defaulted. United States v. Byington, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163563 (D.Nev. Nov. 27, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.