IL: Stopping writing citation to do a dog sniff without justification unlawfully extended the stop

The officer unlawfully prolonged the duration of the stop when he interrupted his traffic citation preparation to conduct a dog sniff based on an unparticularized suspicion of criminal activity. There was no dispute that the dog sniff added time to the total duration of the stop at issue and the additional time was to conduct a check that was unrelated to this otherwise lawful traffic stop. Appellee’s consent did not transform this prolonged stop into a permissible seizure where appellant’s consent was acquired after the officer had explained that he was going to conduct a dog sniff. Suppression affirmed. People v. Pulling, 2015 IL App (3d) 140516, 2015 Ill. App. LEXIS 457 (June 17, 2015).

“Because the good-faith exception is applicable, we need not consider whether there was a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.” Yet, the court practically did decide the probable cause question; it just didn’t want to. United States v. Gayfield, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10139 (5th Cir. June 15, 2015).*

While doing a traffic stop, officers heard six gunshots about 100′ away around the corner. The detention of the people they believed were involved used guns, and handguns, and getting them on the ground. All things considered, it was all reasonable. United States v. Tyson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78503 (E.D.Wis. May 20, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.