D.Mass.: USPS tracks persons tracking suspicious packages by their IP addresses

This mere bailee didn’t have any right to control the package that was shipped, and he thus didn’t have standing to challenge its search, at least recognizing that some bailees might with better facts. More importantly, the government tracked the IP address of the person tracking the package on the USPS website. Unites States v. Bates, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54599 (D. Mass. April 24, 2015).

Defendant was stopped for weaving, was given a warning, was handed back the papers, and then the officer asked about contraband. “The fact that Defendant was not told specifically he was free to leave does not mean he was detained.” Then the drug dog was walked around the car, the court relying on $404,905 (which was expressly rejected six weeks later by SCOTUS in Rodriguez). United States v. Bradley, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54246 (W.D. Mo. March 11, 2015).

Defendant need not have agreed to a “reasonable basis” for a search condition on supervised release. Besides, there was consent. United States v. Majeroni, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6946 (1st Cir. April 27, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.