D.Neb.: IP address associated with CP enough to search computers at address where IP used

“In the Eighth Circuit, for the purposes of determining whether probable cause exists to search a computer [for child pornography], an IP address assigned to a specific user at the time illegal internet activity associated with that IP address occurs is a sufficient basis to find a nexus between the unlawful use of the internet at that IP address and a computer possessed by the subscriber assigned the address.” United States v. Reibert, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9848 (D.Neb. January 27, 2015).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging an “anytime” state search warrant under state law when the case was indicted federally because a violation of state law doesn’t translate into a federal violation. Danner v. United States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181245 (N.D.Ala. December 29, 2014).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not appealing denial of the motion to suppress because, based on the whole record, including the trial, there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. State v. Goldsmith, 2015-Ohio-261, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 220 (5th Dist. January 15, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.