E.D.Ky.: Question is PC for a stop, not whether the defendant actually violated the law

The stop was valid. “Whether Flores actually violated the law is immaterial. The question is only whether Deputy Broce had probable cause to suspect that Flores was committing a traffic violation.” The officer could ask defendant to produce what created the large bulge in his pocket, which was $6,000 in cash. United States v. Flores, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89825 (E.D. Ky. July 2, 2014).*

Defendant was in an auto parts store and the clerk reported him as a possible DUI when he left. An officer encountered him and observed bad driving and stopped him. While Navarrette came down after this case was briefed, it doesn’t affect the outcome because here there was corroboration. State v. Burkett, 2014 SD 38, 2014 S.D. LEXIS 56 (June 25, 2014).*

A juvenile wearing baggy pants and looking at a police car is not reasonable suspicion. In re M.P., 2014-Ohio-2846, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 2863 (1st Dist. June 30, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.