D.Minn.: Def’s admission there was meth in his car was PC for a search; Gant inapplicable

Gant did not void the search of defendant’s car where he’d already admitted there was methamphetamine in the car. Searching the car for meth, officers found a firearm and defendant was a convicted felon. United States v. Spack, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66517 (D. Minn. April 23, 2014)

Defendant’s stop was based on a 911 call where the caller reported that a man in a silver Infiniti pointed a gun at them in a high crime area and, during the call, yelled “that’s the car!” They gave the license number and the car was stopped. United States v. Williams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66936 (D. Mass. May 15, 2014).*

“Although Yazzie asserts that he did not know at the time of his plea that he was waiving the protections of rule 410 or that he was pleading guilty to an information rather than an indictment [and waiving his motion to suppress], these arguments do not render his guilty plea unknowing and involuntary.” United States v. Yazzie, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66729 (D. N.M. May 6, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.