D.Idaho: Providing false name and being nervous when stopped justified search of car

Defendant when stopped for a traffic offense gave his brother’s name, and the stop thus really dragged out because he had no DL and didn’t look like his brother. Then he was nervous. A search of the area around where he was sitting was supported by probable cause for providing false information to the officer. That search and a more intense one was also supported by the search incident doctrine. United States v. Mahler, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15784 (D. Idaho February 6, 2014):

In this case, the totality of the circumstances establish probable cause existed to search the vehicle. The Defendant had provided officers with false information regarding his identity and was unable to produce any kind of identifying information or any of the documentation required to be operating a motor vehicle. In addition, the Defendant appeared to be nervous, agitated, and the officers got the sense that something was not right. The Defendant had clearly attempted to conceal his identity from the officers and he was arrested for providing false information to law enforcement. (Govt Ex. 24.) It was reasonable for the officers to have believed that the Audi would contain contraband or evidence of the Defendant’s identity given the officers had been told that the Defendant had been test-driving the Audi for a week to possibly purchase it. No wallet was found on the Defendant’s person during the frisk and it is reasonable to think that a person driving a vehicle for a week would have some kind of identification in the vehicle if not found on his person. The vehicle contained a great many personal items located in plain view which the officers could reasonably have believed were the Defendants given he had been in possession of the vehicle for a week. (Govt. Ex. 7-8.) Deputy Warren also testified that there were cords by the radio inside the vehicle in plain view that lead him to believe there may be electronics in the Audi which may have also contained evidence of the Defendant’s identity. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that officers had probable cause to search the automobile for evidence of the crime of providing false information to law enforcement.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.