TX1: TCIC/NCIC check that produced only a DWI2d was reliable enough to force a blood draw

When defendant was stopped for a lane violation and was suspected of DWI, the officer asked dispatch to run his name. It came back with a DWI2d, which defendant argued was inconsistent and unreliable without the DWI1st. It wasn’t and the blood draw required by the Texas Transportation Code was valid. Lyssy v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 1367 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) February 6, 2014).*

Defendant was almost in an accident and was followed home. The officer observed him unsteady on his feet, and the arrest was with probable cause. State v. Morris, 2014 Iowa App. LEXIS 110 (February 5, 2014).*

Defendant’s stop was for overtinting, but the officers had reasonable suspicion that the occupants were involved in car burglaries where wallets and credit cards were stolen, and they were suspicious at an ATM, parking so the cameras wouldn’t get the car and looking around too much. During the stop, they were completely uncooperative and their IDs could not be confirmed. United States v. Obasuyi, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14811 (S.D. Fla. January 24, 2014),* adopted 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14830 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 6, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.