Daily Archives: December 1, 2014

Colorado State University Student Legal Services Attorney resigns because of alleged Fourth Amendment violations by CSU

Colorado State University Student Legal Services Attorney resigns because of alleged Fourth Amendment violations by CSU. Collegian: UPDATE: University responds to attorney’s resignation [with original story] by Danny Bishop

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Colorado State University Student Legal Services Attorney resigns because of alleged Fourth Amendment violations by CSU

WaPo: Is Uber’s rider database a sitting duck for hackers?

WaPo: Is Uber’s rider database a sitting duck for hackers? by Craig Timberg: Imagine for a second that your job is to gather intelligence on government officials in Washington, or financiers in London, or entrepreneurs in San Francisco. Imagine further … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Is Uber’s rider database a sitting duck for hackers?

Courthouse News Service: Drug-Planting Case Against Cops Proceeds

Courthouse News Service: Drug-Planting Case Against Cops Proceeds by Arvin Temkar: SAN JOSE (CN) – A woman may pursue claims that Santa Clara County sheriff’s deputies planted drugs in her home, a federal judge ruled. Allison Ross sued the sheriff, … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: Drug-Planting Case Against Cops Proceeds

AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it’s not. Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014). … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Exclusionary rule, Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

M.D.Ala.: The difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress

The difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress is discussed in United States v. Perez-Gomez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165439 (M.D. Ala. November 26, 2014): n.2. This is as opposed to a motion to suppress. Black’s … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: The difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress