BLT: Criminal Defense Lawyers Criticize Stop-and-Frisk Policies

BLT: Criminal Defense Lawyers Criticize Stop-and-Frisk Policies:

Stop-and-frisk policies are damaging and need retooling, a panel of criminal defense lawyers and legal scholars agreed Friday at an event aimed at shedding light on racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal justice system.

“Police interaction with citizens is the front end” of what people see of the criminal justice system, said Darius Charney, senior staff attorney in the racial justice/government misconduct docket at the Center for Constitutional Rights, speaking during a panel discussion sponsored by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and other groups at New York University-Washington, D.C.

Charney pointed to a footnote in the landmark 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, which held that police in some circumstances can stop and search a suspect without violating the Fourth Amendment. The footnote stated that actively pursuing such a policy “cannot help but be a severely exacerbating factor in police-community tensions” – a foreshadowing, he said, to what’s happening now in New York City with its stop-and-frisk policy.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.